Headlight is a talent assessment platform. We help tech employers make better hiring decisions by allowing candidates to demonstrate their skills and abilities via take-home assignments. Our goal is to help leaders identify the right talent for their organization and let skilled professionals show the world what they’re capable of.
Take-home assignments are short projects that require candidates to use skills and perform tasks that are relevant to the job and are done “on your own time” rather than in-person For engineers, this might mean writing a small program or refactoring a piece of code. For product managers, it might mean coming up with a new feature for an existing product or developing a go-to-market strategy.
Employers can easily setup one or more take-home assignments for their candidates, or choose from our growing library, and send them individually to candidates. Assignments can have due dates and optional time limits to ensure consistency. Candidates get individual landing pages and don’t see assignment details until they start.
Take-home assignments allow employers to see how a candidate can understand, diagnose, and solve problems independently—similar to how they might in a job. Interviews are generally conducted as a real-time conversation over the phone or in-person where candidates respond to questions about their work and themselves.
The truth is, interviews are not always the best way to evaluate someone’s ability. Research has found that interviewing people, especially without a rigorous and structured format, is a poor predictor of future performance. 
Take-home assignments are a type of work sample, which has been shown to a much stronger predictor of success on the job than interviews . They can be given to multiple candidates at the same time, and allow employers to focus less on how impressively a candidate can talk, and more on what a candidate can actually do.
 Schmidt, F., & Hunter, J. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262-274.